Real-world experience of rituximab biosimilar GP2013 in rheumatoid arthritis patients naïve to or switched from reference rituximab.

Randomized controlled trials showed high comparability of biosimilar rituximab (bs-RTX) GP2013 to biologic originator RTX (bo-RTX). Data on effectiveness of switching from bo-RTX to bs-RTX, starting therapy with bs-RTX, and bs-RTX drug survival in real-world setting are sparse. To explore long-term drug effectiveness and survival of bs-RTX GP2013 in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients both naïve to and mandatory switched from bo-RTX, and to clarify reasons for treatment cessation. Retrospective observational cohort study including RA outpatient clinic patients treated with bs-RTX between 2018 and 2021 in Norway. Patients were examined and monitored using recommended measures for disease activity and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). For description of population medians and interquartile range were used. Difference between observation times was assessed with Signed-Rank test, drug survival with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Reasons for discontinuation were ascertained. Among 110 patients, at baseline, 88 were mandatory switched from bo-RTX and 22 were RTX-naïve. During 2-year follow-up, disease activity and PROs measures remained stable in switchers subgroup and improved in subgroup starting bs-RTX for the first time. Overall drug survival was 80.0% after 1 year and 57.7% after 2 years and was significantly higher in bs-RTX-switched than in bs-RTX-naïve patients (p = 0.036). Two most frequently reported reasons for drug discontinuation were remission (38.6%) and doctor's decision (27.1%). RA patients treated with bs-RTX had satisfactory treatment response and drug retention rates which supports equivalence of bs-RTX GP2013 to bo-RTX, both in patients naïve to and mandatory switched from bo-RTX.

Rituximab-induced hypogammaglobulinaemia in patients affected by idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: a multicentre study.

OBJECTIVES: Rituximab (RTX) is an anti-CD20 chimeric monoclonal antibody recommended as off-label treatment in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). The present study aimed to evaluate changes in immunoglobulin (Ig) levels during RTX-treatment and their potential association with infections in a cohort of IIM patients. METHODS: Patients evaluated in the Myositis clinic belonging to the Rheumatology Units of Siena, Bari and Palermo University Hospitals, and treated for the first time with RTX were enrolled. Demographic, clinical, laboratory and treatment variables, including previous and concomitant immunosuppressive drugs and glucocorticoid (GC) dosage were analysed before (T0) and after 6 (T1) and 12 (T2) months of RTX treatment. RESULTS: Thirty patients (median age, IQR 56 (42-66); 22 female) were selected. During the observational period, low levels of IgG (<700 mg/dl) and IgM (<40 mg/dl) occurred in 10% and 17% of patients, respectively. However, no one showed severe (IgG<400 mg/dl) hypogammaglobulinaemia. IgA concentrations were lower at T1 than T0 (p=0.0218), while IgG concentrations were lower at T2 compared to those at baseline (p=0.0335). IgM concentrations were lower at T1 and T2 than T0 (p<0.0001), as well at T2 than T1 (p=0.0215). Three patients suffered major infections, two others had paucisymptomatic COVID-19, one suffered from mild zoster. GC dosages at T0 were inversely correlated with IgA T0 concentrations (p=0.004, r=- 0.514). No correlation was found between demographic, clinical and treatment variables and Ig serum levels. CONCLUSIONS: Hypogammaglobulinaemia following RTX is uncommon in IIM and is not related to any clinical variables, including GC dosage and previous treatments. IgG and IgM monitoring after RTX treatment does not seem useful in stratifying patients who require closer safety monitoring and prevention of infection, due to the lack of association between hypogammaglobulinaemia and the onset of severe infections.

Optimal time for COVID-19 vaccination in rituximab-treated dermatologic patients.

Background: By depleting circulating B lymphocytes, rituximab time-dependently suppresses coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines' humoral immunogenicity for a prolonged period. The optimal time to vaccinate rituximab-exposed immune-mediated dermatologic disease (IMDD) patients is currently unclear. Objective: To estimate the vaccination timeframe that equalized the occurrence of humoral immunogenicity outcomes between rituximab-exposed and rituximab-naïve IMDD patients. Methods: This retrospective cohort study recruited rituximab-exposed and age-matched rituximab-naïve subjects tested for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-specific immunity post-vaccination. Baseline clinical and immunological data (i.e., immunoglobulin levels, lymphocyte immunophenotyping) and SARS-CoV-2-specific immunity levels were extracted. The outcomes compared were the percentages of subjects who produced neutralizing antibodies (seroconversion rates, SR) and SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG levels among seroconverters. The outcomes were first analyzed using multiple regressions adjusted for the effects of corticosteroid use, steroid-spearing agents, and pre-vaccination immunological status (i.e., IgM levels, the percentages of the total, naïve, and memory B lymphocytes) to identify rituximab-related immunogenicity outcomes. The rituximab-related outcome differences with a 95% confidence interval (CI) between groups were calculated, starting by including every subject and then narrowing down to those with longer rituximab-to-vaccination intervals (≥3, ≥6, ≥9, ≥12 months). The desirable cut-off performances were <25% outcome inferiority observed among rituximab-exposed subgroups compared to rituximab-naïve subjects, and the positive likelihood ratio (LR+) for the corresponding outcomes ≥2. Findings: Forty-five rituximab-exposed and 90 rituximab-naive subjects were included. The regression analysis demonstrated a negative association between rituximab exposure status and SR but not with SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG levels. Nine-month rituximab-to-vaccination cut-off fulfilled our prespecified diagnostic performance (SR difference between rituximab-exposed and rituximab-naïve group [95%CI]: -2.6 [-23.3, 18.1], LR+: 2.6) and coincided with the repopulation of naïve B lymphocytes in these patients. Conclusions: Nine months of rituximab-to-vaccination interval maximize the immunological benefits of COVID-19 vaccines while avoiding unnecessary delay in vaccination and rituximab treatment for IMDD patients.

COVID-19 disease frequency, risk factors, and re-infection rates in patients with autoimmune rheumatic disease receiving rituximab.

INTRODUCTION: Rituximab, which is used in autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARD), can cause both an increased risk of development of COVID-19 disease and re-infection due to its potent and long-acting immunosuppression. So, we aimed to evaluate the frequency, risk factors and re-infection rates of COVID-19 in ARD patients receiving rituximab. METHODS: A single-center retrospective study was performed with patients receiving rituximab for ARD in 12 months before the onset of COVID-19 in Turkey. The data regarding severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 reverse transcription polymerized chain reaction (RT-PCR) test, clinical, laboratory, and mortality data of all patients were collected from medical records. Logistic regression analysis was used for predictors of COVID-19 disease. COVID-19 re-infection was defined as RT-PCR positivity and recurrence of acute COVID-19 symptoms after at least 1 negative RT-PCR in patients with clinical improvement. RESULTS: Ninety-eight ARD patients with rituximab were evaluated and 23 (23%) of them had COVID-19. The presence of hypogammaglobulinemia increased the risk of COVID-19 disease 8-fold. COVID-19 pneumonia occurred in 13 (57%) and these patients' age was higher than those without pneumonia (59.6 ± 11.8 vs 44.9 ± 14.2 years, P = 0.013). Mortality due to COVID-19 was 13% and COVID-19 re-infection was seen in 20% of survivors. CONCLUSION: Regardless of the underlying rheumatic disease and organ involvements, hypogammaglobulinemia in ARD could be a risk factor for COVID-19 development, and advanced age could be for COVID-19 severity. Moreover, COVID-19 re-infection rates are high.

Safety and efficacy of induction immunochemotherapy with rituximab, methotrexate, ifosfamide, and vincristine (R-MIV) in patients with primary CNS lymphoma including recent COVID-19 pandemic experience.

Clinical data on primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma (PCNSL) patients is mostly generated from prospective studies, and many frail real-world patients are not included. Recently,the diagnosis and treatment of PCNSL patients was confounded by the COVID-19 pandemic. In particular, treatment with high-dose cytarabine was linked to increased risk of pneumonia and virus persistence. We report on outcome of the induction regimen R-MIV (rituximab, methotrexate, ifosfamide, and vincristine) involving intensive administration of high-dose methotrexate (3.5 g/m2 ) with ifosfamide, every 2 weeks and rituximab once per week for six doses. The median age and performance status (PS) for 64 patients was 58 years and 2 (PS 3; 22%) respectively. The overall response rate by magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography (MRI/CT) was 73% (n = 46/63), with an additional 17.5% (n = 11/63) patients without measurable disease at baseline. Grade 3-4 haematological toxicity was low for R-MIV (neutropenia: 25% and thrombocytopenia: 1%). Three patients (4.7%) died from treatment-related toxicity. Co-existence of SARS-CoV-2 infection with cytomegalovirus reactivation and the varicella-zoster virus in two patients was fatal. Fifty patients (78%) were eligible for consolidation. Median progression-free and overall survival were not reached (median follow-up: 44 months). In conclusion, the R-MIV regimen is feasible in routine practice, effective and safe, even during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Risk of infections in patients with pemphigus treated with rituximab vs. azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil: a large-scale global cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The risk of infectious complications among patients with pemphigus managed by rituximab is yet to be precisely elucidated. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the risk of infections in patients with pemphigus managed by rituximab vs. first-line corticosteroid-sparing agents [azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)]. METHODS: A global population-based cohort study compared patients with pemphigus initiating rituximab (n = 963) vs. azathioprine or MMF (n = 963) regarding the risk of 26 different infections. Propensity score matching was conducted to optimize comparability. RESULTS: During the initial 12 months following treatment, patients under rituximab experienced elevated risk of COVID-19 [hazard ratio (HR) 1.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-3.14; P = 0.028], parasitic diseases (HR 3.22, 95% CI 1.04-9.97; P = 0.032) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.04-2.58; P = 0.033). When evaluating infections developing ≥ 12 months after drug initiation, rituximab was associated with greater risk of pneumonia (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.00-2.10; P = 0.047), COVID-19 (HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.49-2.33; P < 0.001), osteomyelitis (HR 2.42, 95% CI 1.11-5.31; P = 0.023), herpes simplex virus (HR 2.06, 95% CI 1.03-4.11; P = 0.037) and CMV (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.07-2.49; P = 0.023) infections. CONCLUSIONS: Within the first 12 months after treatment, patients under rituximab experience an elevated risk of COVID-19, parasitic and CMV infections. Rituximab is associated with pneumonia, osteomyelitis and viral diseases even beyond the first year after therapy. Pneumococcal vaccine and suppressive antiviral therapy should be considered even 1 year following therapy. There is no signal for elevated risk of tuberculosis, hepatitis B virus reactivation, Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy.

Early efficacy and safety of obinutuzumab with chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with follicular lymphoma: A real-world retrospective report of the Polish Lymphoma Research Group.

BACKGROUND: The first-line obinutuzumab-based immunochemotherapy improves the outcome of patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) compared with rituximab-based regimens. However, infusion-related reactions occur in almost half of patients during the 1st obinutuzumab administration. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to evaluate the early effectiveness and safety of obinutuzumab-based induction regimens in a real-world setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Outcomes of patients diagnosed with FL and treated with obinutuzumab between January 2020 and September 2021 were analyzed. RESULTS: The study group included 143 treatment-naïve patients with FL. The median age was 52 years (range: 28-89 years); 45.1% of patients had a high-risk disease as assessed using the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI). Induction chemotherapy included: O-CVP (obinutuzumab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisolone) in 49.0% of patients, O-CHOP (O-CVP plus doxorubicin) in 28.7% and O-BENDA (obinutuzumab, bendamustine) in 22.4%. Complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) rates were 69.9% and 26.5%, respectively. There was no difference in response rates between different regimens (p = 0.309). Maintenance was started in 115 patients (85.2%). In the 1st cycle, obinutuzumab was administered as a single 1000-milligram infusion in 47.9% of patients, whereas in 52.1%, initial infusions were split over 2 days (100 mg/900 mg). Infusion-related reactions were reported only during the 1st administration of obinutuzumab in 9.1% of patients, with a similar incidence in those receiving the total dose on a single day or split over 2 days (p = 0.458). The most common adverse events were hematological. Five patients died from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). CONCLUSION: The early responses to induction regimens and adverse events profile were similar for every type of induction treatment. The infusion-related reactions were rare and limited to the 1st dose of obinutuzumab.

Peripheral Ulcerative Keratitis in a Young Lady with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Post Rituximab Infusion-A Case Report.

AIM: We report a new ocular finding of episcleritis (OD) and peripheral ulcerative keratitis (OS) in a 40-year-old lady with a 13-year history of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 3 weeks post-rituximab infusion. MATERIALS & METHODS: Retrospective case report. RESULTS: A 40-year-old lady with a history of SLE and 3 weeks post rituximab infusion developed a new onset episcleritis (OD) and peripheral ulcerative keratitis (OS). As the PUK continued to advance with a leading edge, intravenous methyl prednisolone 1 gm/day was given for 3 days followed by a slow tapering course of oral prednisolone 50 mg/day. Though her ocular inflammation resolved, she developed pneumonia 6 weeks later. At 10 months follow-up, there were no ocular recurrences. She is currently on mycophenolate mofetil 2 gm/day along with oral prednisolone of 10 mg/day. CONCLUSION: This case highlights the new occurrence of episcleritis and PUK in SLE post-rituximab infusion.

Rituximab is associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A retrospective, nationally sampled cohort study from the U.S. National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C).

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether rituximab (RTX) is associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We used the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C), the largest US cohort of COVID-19 cases and controls, to identify patients with RA (International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 code, M05.X or M06.X). Key outcomes were COVID-19-related hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, 30-day mortality, and World Health Organization (WHO) classification for COVID-19 severity. We used multivariable logistic regression models to assess the association between RTX use and the odds of COVID-19 outcomes compared with the use of conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), adjusting for demographics, medical comorbidities, smoking status, body mass index, US region and COVID-19 treatments. RESULTS: A total of 69,549 patients met our eligibility criteria of which 22,956 received a COVID-19 positive diagnosis between 1/1/2020 and 9/16/2021. Median (IQR) age of the cohort was 63 (52-72) years, 76% of the cohort was female, 68% was non-Hispanic/Latinx White, and 73% was non-smokers. Prior to their first COVID-19 diagnosis, 364 patients were exposed to RTX. Compared to the use of csDMARDs, RTX use was associated with an increased odds of COVID-19-related hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.1, 95% confidence interval 1.5-3.0), ICU admission (aOR 5.2, 1.8-15.4) and invasive ventilation (aOR 2.7, 1.4-5.5). Results were confirmed in multiple sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Our findings can guide patients, providers, and policymakers regarding the increased risks associated with RTX use during the COVID-19 pandemic. These results can help risk stratification and prognosis-assessment.

Immunogenicity and safety of a fourth COVID-19 vaccination in rituximab-treated patients: an open-label extension study.

OBJECTIVES: Patients under rituximab therapy are at high risk for a severe COVID-19 disease course. Humoral immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination are vastly diminished in B-cell-depleted patients, even after a third vaccine dose. However, it remains unclear whether these patients benefit from a fourth vaccination and whether continued rituximab therapy affects antibody development. METHODS: In this open-label extension trial, 37 rituximab-treated patients who received a third dose with either a vector or mRNA-based vaccine were vaccinated a fourth time with an mRNA-based vaccine (mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2). Key endpoints included the humoral and cellular immune response as well as safety after a fourth vaccination. RESULTS: The number of patients who seroconverted increased from 12/36 (33%) to 21/36 (58%) following the fourth COVID-19 vaccination. In patients with detectable antibodies to the spike protein's receptor-binding domain (median: 8.0 binding antibody units (BAU)/mL (quartiles: 0.4; 13.8)), elevated levels were observed after the fourth vaccination (134.0 BAU/mL (quartiles: 25.5; 1026.0)). Seroconversion and antibody increase were strongly diminished in patients who received rituximab treatment between the third and the fourth vaccination. The cellular immune response declined 12 weeks after the third vaccination, but could only be slightly enhanced by a fourth vaccination. No unexpected safety signals were detected, one serious adverse event not related to vaccination occurred. CONCLUSIONS: A fourth vaccine dose is immunogenic in a fraction of rituximab-treated patients. Continuation of rituximab treatment reduced humoral immune response, suggesting that rituximab affects a second booster vaccination. It might therefore be considered to postpone rituximab treatment in clinically stable patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 2021-002348-57.

Ibrutinib plus Bendamustine and Rituximab in Untreated Mantle-Cell Lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Ibrutinib, a Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, may have clinical benefit when administered in combination with bendamustine and rituximab and followed by rituximab maintenance therapy in older patients with untreated mantle-cell lymphoma. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients 65 years of age or older to receive ibrutinib (560 mg, administered orally once daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects) or placebo, plus six cycles of bendamustine (90 mg per square meter of body-surface area) and rituximab (375 mg per square meter). Patients with an objective response (complete or partial response) received rituximab maintenance therapy, administered every 8 weeks for up to 12 additional doses. The primary end point was progression-free survival as assessed by the investigators. Overall survival and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: Among 523 patients, 261 were randomly assigned to receive ibrutinib and 262 to receive placebo. At a median follow-up of 84.7 months, the median progression-free survival was 80.6 months in the ibrutinib group and 52.9 months in the placebo group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.59 to 0.96; P = 0.01). The percentage of patients with a complete response was 65.5% in the ibrutinib group and 57.6% in the placebo group (P = 0.06). Overall survival was similar in the two groups. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events during treatment was 81.5% in the ibrutinib group and 77.3% in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Ibrutinib treatment in combination with standard chemoimmunotherapy significantly prolonged progression-free survival. The safety profile of the combined therapy was consistent with the known profiles of the individual drugs. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development and Pharmacyclics; SHINE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01776840.).

The use of obinutuzumab and ofatumumab in the treatment of immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.

Rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, can be used to treat immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) during acute presentation or disease relapse. Undesirable side-effects include severe hypersensitivity reactions, particularly anaphylaxis and rituximab-induced serum sickness, with a minority not maintaining a response to treatment. Alternative humanised anti-CD20 treatments, obinutuzumab and ofatumumab, have been used. A review of the UK TTP Registry showed 15 patients received these drugs over 26 treatment episodes (eight obinutuzumab and 18 ofatumumab). Indications for alternative anti-CD20 treatment were severe infusion-related reactions, acute rituximab-induced serum sickness and a short duration of disease remission. All patients achieved disease remission (ADAMTS13 [A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13] activity ≥30 iu/dl) after a median 15 days and 92% of episodes achieved complete remission (≥60 iu/dl). Seven patients required further treatment for disease relapse with a median relapse-free survival of 17.4 months. All patients continued to respond to re-treatment with the preceding drug when relapse occurred. There were four adverse events in 26 treatment episodes (15%) - two infections and two infusion reactions. These results suggest that obinutuzumab and ofatumumab may be considered as an alternative option to rituximab in the treatment of iTTP with a comparable safety profile, absence of significant hypersensitivity reactions and sustained normalisation of ADAMTS13.

Immunogenicity and safety of two doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in kidney transplant recipients with low-dose rituximab.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated whether the treatment history of low-dose rituximab affected safety profiles, and humoral and cellular responses induced by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 messenger ribonucleic acid vaccine in healthy controls and kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: We enrolled 10 healthcare workers as controls, 22 kidney transplant recipients with rituximab, and 36 kidney transplant recipients without rituximab without history of coronavirus disease 2019 who received two doses of vaccine. We assessed anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 spike antibody and the antigen-specific T cells using enzyme-linked immunospot against spike protein at baseline and after two doses of vaccine. RESULTS: All controls showed anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antibody seroconversion and enzyme-linked immunospot positivity. Only 19/58 (33%) kidney transplant recipients experienced anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antibody seroconversion and 31/58 (53%) kidney transplant recipients developed enzyme-linked immunospot assay positivity after vaccination. The anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antibody seroconversion rate and enzyme-linked immunospot assay positivity rate after vaccination were not significantly different between kidney transplant recipients with or without rituximab. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated rituximab was not associated with a lack of humoral and cellular responses to the vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose rituximab in kidney transplant recipients did not affect humoral or cellular responses to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 messenger ribonucleic acid vaccine without severe systemic adverse events including the deterioration of kidney function.

A Fatal Breakthrough COVID-19 Case Following Bendamustine-Rituximab Therapy.

Although messenger ribonucleic acid vaccines are substantially effective toward SARS-CoV-2 infection, patients with hematologic malignancies are still prone to the virus. Herein, we report a fatal case of breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant infection in a patient with mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma with remission by bendamustine-rituximab (BR) therapy completed a year ago. The serologic study revealed impaired responsiveness toward vaccines and prolonged high viral load after infection. BR therapy seemingly induced an immune escape. Prevention and treatment strategies for such vulnerable patients should be clarified immediately.

Effect of Immunosuppressive Diseases and Rituximab Infusions on Allowing COVID-19 Infection to Relapse.

INTRODUCTION: Relapsing COVID-19 infections have been reported, but their etiology and severity are still unknown. In addition, there have been no cases in the literature that associate relapsing infection with immunosuppression, either from a disease course or medications. CASE PRESENTATION: This case series illustrates two patients who developed a relapsed infection, likely from recent rituximab infusions. In addition, both cases depicted a severe form of infection than the initial one. Laboratory investigations revealed these patients were unable to produce COVID-19 antibodies, even though one of the patients received convalescent plasma. CONCLUSION: Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of relapsing COVID-19, especially in immunosuppressed patients. Because rituximab induces B-cell depletion, it can also decrease the effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine. Therefore, these patients should receive the vaccine before their scheduled rituximab infusion.

Increased rate of hospitalisation for COVID-19 among rituximab-treated multiple sclerosis patients: A study of the Swedish multiple sclerosis registry.

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this study was to analyse the association between multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying therapy (DMT) exposure and hospitalisation in patients infected with COVID-19. METHODS: Associations between MS DMT exposure and COVID-19 hospitalisation were analysed using univariable and multi-variable-clustered propensity score weighted logistic regression, where the models were clustered on the individual patients to control for patients contributing multiple COVID-19 episodes. FINDINGS: As of 18 January 2021, a total of 476 reported COVID-19 cases had been recorded in MS patients in the Swedish MS registry. Of these, 292 (61.3%) had confirmed COVID-19. The mean value (standard deviation (SD)) age at infection was 44.0 years (11.6). Of the 292 confirmed infections, 68 (23.2%) required hospitalisation. A total of 49 of the 164 confirmed COVID-19 patients on rituximab at baseline (29.9%) required hospitalisation, compared to a rate of 12.7% for all other DMTs combined. Rituximab in confirmed COVID-19 patients was associated with 2.95 times the odds of hospitalisation relative to any other DMT combined (odds ratio = 2.95; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.48-5.87). INTERPRETATION: Rituximab treatment, known to increase the risk of severe infections in general, also confers such a risk for MS patients with COVID-19, in comparison with other MS DMTs.